We came across an interesting article in The Atlantic recently titled Beyond Bodice-Rippers: How Romance Came to Embrace Feminism. (NB I should mention that we’re not great fans of the term ‘bodice-rippers’.) In the article, journalist Jessica Luther chats to romance authors and writers how they see feminism and its place in romantic fiction and concludes;
The potential for a romance novel to be feminist exists each time an author sits down to write one. Lynne [a scholar] argues that “Romance novels are as feminist, or anti-feminist, as anything else in our society: namely, that it depends on the novel, but most of the novels we’re talking about are produced within a society that is heteronormative and patriarchal (and most privilege whiteness, as well).” A genre centered on women, written primarily by women, and consumed mainly by women cannot be ignored because it can teach us about what women want. “Romance,” Cowan says, “even when it’s not feminist, gives us a reference point to begin looking at our own biases and desires.” The very discussion about where women derive pleasure and why is a feminist project.
Click here to read the full article.
Next week, we’ll have an extract to share – from The New York Times bestselling author Julia Quinn’s collection of “second epilogues” to her Bridgerton series, one of our favourite historical romance series! Julia has also written a novella especially for the print version of The Bridgertons: Happily Ever After which is out in June.

The F Word
09 Tuesday Apr 2013
Posted in Claire's Post


